Spamdex - Spam Archive

Report spam

Send in your spam and get the offenders listed

Forward the spam you receive to questions@spamdex.co.uk

Also in pressinstitute.org

Need to Know: Americans distrust information sources, tools for covering severe weather, and asking people to pay for news

Need to Know
Tuesday, September 12, 2017

Fresh useful insights for people advancing quality, innovative and sustainable journalism

OFF THE TOP
You might have heard: Trust is “not only a journalistic aspiration, but a business imperative. People who put a higher premium on trust‑related factors are more engaged with news, are more likely to pay for it, install news apps, or share and promote news with their friends”

But did you know: Nearly half of all adults in the US have a high distrust of information organizations — and especially news organizations, research from Pew shows (Pew Research Center)
According to new research from the Pew Research Center, 49 percent of Americans are both distrustful of information sources and have little interest in improving their digital literacy skills. For this study, “information sources” includes news organizations, libraries, government sources, financial institutions and more. Pew concludes that there’s no one-size-fits-all approach to reaching people: “Information purveyors might need to use very different methods to get material to the Eager and Willing, who are relatively trusting of institutional information and eager to learn, compared with the tactics they might consider in trying to get the attention of the Cautious and Curious, who are open to learning but relatively distrusting of institutional information.”

+ “Combined, these ... groups make up nearly half of the U.S. adult population, which should represent both a significant challenge and opportunity to news organizations,” Ricardo Bilton writes on the findings (Nieman Lab)

+ Earlier: Research by API shows that Americans are skeptical of “the news media” in the abstract, but generally trust the news they themselves rely on

+ Noted: Research from Yale University suggests that labeling fake news on Facebook doesn’t work: The study found that tagging false stories as “disputed by third party fact-checkers” has a small impact on whether readers perceive the headline has true (Politico); Uber’s new CEO Dara Khosrowshahi is leaving the New York Times Co.’s board of directors, citing his new responsibilities at Uber (TechCrunch); RT says its associates in the U.S. were asked by the Department of Justice to register as foreign agents (Newsweek); Honolulu Civil Beat launched a bot last month around the questions, “How can a news organization use Messenger to start a genuine conversation with readers at scale? Can messaging be a viable way to field news tips from readers?” (Nieman Lab); Texas Observer adds a full-time rural reporter, a position funded by Laurene Powell Jobs’ Emerson Collective (Washington Post); The FTC filed its first case against social media “influencers” last week, saying two popular online gamers posted messages endorsing a game without disclosing that they owned the company and sending 21 warning letters to other prominent social media influencers (Axios)

 

TRY THIS AT HOME
‘The most useful apps, tools and sites we used during Hurricane Irma’ (Poynter)
After evacuating Florida ahead of Hurricane Irma, Poynter’s Ren LaForme is sharing the apps, websites and tools he used to track the hurricane and its coverage by local news outlets. Some highlights: Snapchat’s global map feature shows public snaps from a specific area, Facebook’s map of live streams had verified, geotagged videos of Irma’s impact from the Caribbean into Florida, and Facebook Messenger and Zello can be good alternatives to texting when cell phone coverage gets spotty.

+ How to verify photos and videos on social media by confirming the time and place (MediaShift)

 

OFFSHORE
Where are the female journalists in UK newspapers? Most of the stories in the UK’s biggest national newspapers are written by men (European Journalism Observatory)
According to a recent European Journalism Observatory survey of four national newspapers in the U.K., the majority of news, business and analysis stories are written by men, and there’s more photographs on those pages of men than there are of women. Analyzing the Financial Times, Guardian, Times and Daily Mail, EJO found that 65 percent of stories in the news and business sections were written by men — and on the “comment” pages, 77 percent of articles were written by men. Earlier research has shown that more women are entering journalism as a profession than men. But Caroline Lees and Hannah Anson explain that this study shows “that despite figures showing more female than male journalists enter the profession, men appear to have higher-profile roles as their careers progress.”

+ A mayor in Brazil was arrested and accused of involvement with the 2016 death of journalist Maurício Campos Rosa (Knight Center for Journalism in the Americas)

 

OFFBEAT
Smartphones are driving all growth in web traffic — but not through apps (Recode)
According to new data from Adobe Analytics, smartphone are driving all growth in U.S. web traffic as the share of web traffic on tablets and computers has declined. There’s been a 68 percent increase in smartphone web traffic in the U.S. since January 2015, while both desktop and tablets saw declines in web traffic over the same time period. “All that smartphone web traffic, however, hasn’t translated to traffic on smartphone apps,” writes Rani Molla on the findings. “Americans have opened apps 22 percent less on smartphones and nearly 50 percent less on tablets compared with the beginning of 2016. The decline, however, didn’t extend to top apps by Amazon, Google and Facebook.”

+ Is artificial intelligence creating a dilemma in fair use? “In the context of commercial, expressive machine learning, no outcome seems desirable. If expressive machine learning weren’t fair use, an author could seek outsize remedies simply because her work ended up in a training dataset among thousands of other works. … Then again, if fair use gave companies carte blanche to train AI on copyrighted works without compensating authors, human creators would miss out on income that the spirit, and arguably the letter, of copyright law entitle them to receive. This would be a boon for AI and for those who stand to profit from it, but it’s not clear that society as a whole would benefit,” says Berkman Klein Center for Internet and Society fellow Ben Sobel (Intellectual Property Watch)

 

UP FOR DEBATE
When big networks fail to account for their mistakes, viewers’ trust is eroded and questions arise about their processes (Poynter)
In light of recent high-profile retracted stories by CNN and Fox News, former NPR ombud Alicia Shepard says, “Major news organizations demand accountability from government officials, corporations and others involved in powerful positions, but aren’t nearly as accountable about their processes or mistakes. … Until Americans get a better understanding of how newsrooms work and how mistakes can happen even with in-place safeguards, distrust of journalists will continue.” Given that CNN and Fox News haven’t been able to explain what went wrong in their reporting, Shepard argues: “Why should other companies or government officials be forthright with CNN or Fox?”

+ “What do The New York Times and The Guardian seeking philanthropic support have to do with Blodget's pronouncement about Business Insider's revised ambitions? All three developments are about media execs confronting the realities of the publishing economy circa 2017.” (Ad Age)

 

SHAREABLE
‘Local journalism is doing great work across the country while fighting cutbacks and tight budgets. But we need people to stop expecting news to be free’ (Guardian)
Local newspapers are critical when it comes to covering inequality in the U.S., Kathleen McLaughlin, who’s been working with the Guardian and Economic Hardship Reporting Project on their new On the Ground project, writes. These news organizations are producing impressive journalism while facing increasingly tighter budgets — but many readers expect that journalism to be available for free. What can you do about that? McLaughlin writes: “Find a news outlet valuable to your life and pay for it. Plain and simple. It’s not a long-term solution, but we need people to stop expecting the news be the same as air and sunlight – absolutely free.”

 

Reply to this email to send us questions, comments or tips. Know someone else who should be reading Need To Know? Send them this link to sign up.

This email was sent to
why did I get this?    unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences
American Press Institute · 4401 N. Fairfax Drive · Suite 300 · Arlington, VA 22203 · USA


---------------------------

All titles, content, publisher names, trademarks, artwork, and associated imagery are trademarks and/or copyright material of their respective owners. All rights reserved. The Spam Archive website contains material for general information purposes only. It has been written for the purpose of providing information and historical reference containing in the main instances of business or commercial spam.

Lets beat spam together
Many of the messages in Spamdex's archive contain forged headers in one form or another. The fact that an email claims to have come from one email address or another does not mean it actually originated at that address!
Please use spamdex responsibly.


Yes You! Get INVOLVED - Send in your spam and report offenders

Create a rule in outlook or simply forward the junk email you receive to questions@spamdex.co.uk | See contributors

Google + Spam | 2010- 2017 Spamdex - The Spam Archive for the internet. unsolicited electric messages (spam) archived for posterity. Link to us and help promote Spamdex as a means of forcing Spammers to re-think the amount of spam they send us.

The Spam Archive - Chronicling spam emails into readable web records index for all time

Please contact us with any comments or questions at questions@spamdex.co.uk. Spam Archive is a non-profit library of thousands of spam email messages sent to a single email address. A number of far-sighted people have been saving all their spam and have put it online. This is a valuable resource for anyone writing Bayesian filters. The Spam Archive is building a digital library of Internet spam. Your use of the Archive is subject to the Archive's Terms of Use. All emails viewed are copyright of the respected companies or corporations. Special thanks: We would like to thank Benedict who is a SEO Consultant who has freely given up his time to advise us on how best to maximise on our organic search traffic strategy and also for his wonderful creative vision on how to spread the word about Spamdex and how we try to combat spam across the globe. Click here for more information.

Our inspiration is the "Internet Archive" USA. "Libraries exist to preserve society's cultural artefacts and to provide access to them. If libraries are to continue to foster education and scholarship in this era of digital technology, it's essential for them to extend those functions into the digital world." This is our library of unsolicited emails from around the world. See https://archive.org. Spamdex is in no way associated though. Supporters and members of http://spam.abuse.net Helping rid the internet of spam, one email at a time. Working with Inernet Aware to improve user knowlegde on keeping safe online. | Link to us | Terms | Privacy | Cookies | Complaints | Copyright | Spam emails / ICO | Spam images | Sitemap

Important: Users take note, this is Spamdex - The Spam Archive for the internet. Some of the pages indexed could contain offensive language or contain fraudulent offers. If an offer looks too good to be true it probably is! Please tread, carefully, all of the links should be fine. Clicking I agree means you agree to our terms and conditions. We cannot be held responsible etc etc.

The Spam Archive - Chronicling spam emails into readable web records

The Glass House | London | SW19 8AE |
Spamdex is a digital archive of unsolicited electronic mail 4.8 out of 5 based on reviews
Spamdex - The Spam Archive Located in London, SW19 8AE. Phone: 080000 0514541.